tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14812333.post5993553399197897057..comments2023-11-05T02:01:53.847-06:00Comments on Antagony & Ecstasy: IN A MUSICAL, NOTHING DREADFUL EVER HAPPENSTimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09491952893581644049noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14812333.post-83506809595926741742015-11-21T17:11:22.089-06:002015-11-21T17:11:22.089-06:00Ehm. She can't tell why she killed the man bec...Ehm. She can't tell why she killed the man because if she does they'll find out that she gave that money to the doctor and this money will be spent to pay for her lawyer or kept as a piece of evidence in her trial. She needs to keep it secret because the most important thing for her is for her son to get the operation. Only when, close to her death, her friend Cvalda tells her that the boy received the operation that very day she is in peace with herself, and doesn't mind to die anymore. But dying without knowing whether her son will be able to live a normal life, that is what destroys her heart, and that's why she cannot let anyone take the money away. Was that so difficult to understand?DiVxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13061441250140696222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14812333.post-15513753048500421482009-11-04T15:44:06.763-06:002009-11-04T15:44:06.763-06:00Your criticism of LVT has made me reevaluate certa...Your criticism of LVT has made me reevaluate certain things and I thank you for that. Having said that, "dogme 95 filmmaking" (as the actual thing no longer exists) has one benefit; name one film by this director with a bad leading performance. The mysoginist claim is tricky, though I don't deny LVT has that tendency. What I'm saying is that the studio system has been mysoginist since before LVT was born, so the only difference between one and the other is that one is covert and the other overt, hence both should be put in evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com