29 October 2012

NOVEMBER 2012 MOVIE PREVIEW

Great news! After what feels like a whole year of being insanely grouchy about every single new release coming down the pike, we've hit a month with not one, but several films that I'm hugely enthusiastic for, at least sight-unseen. Or, you know, three. Is three several? It's some, anyway.

And if we throw in the movies I'm ironically fake-excited for, that number doubles! Oh prestige movie season, you always do save the day, don't you?


2.11.2012

But before we get all ahead of ourselves, some residual grouchiness.

I am nothing if not a Disney aficionado in good standing, so I should theoretically be at least intellectually excited for the release of the 52nd entry in the Official Disney Animation Feature Canon; but dear Lord, am I ever not looking forward to Wreck-It Ralph. A big part of this - a part that any sane person would consider excessive to the point of real psychological dysfunction - is that I am completely pissed-off about the character designs, which from the vantage point of not having seen the thing strike me as completely missing the point. For the game does, does it not, consist entirely of video game characters from 1982 to the present day? And video game graphics have, have they not, evolved in indescribable ways in that 30-year span? So would it not be more true to the spirit of the thing to represent the various character in the style of their generation of gaming, rather than just have a whole movie full of fully-rendered CGI characters designed to varying level of caricature? It's the kind of obvious missed chance at the conceptual level that angers me so much that even if the script was the fucking Hedda Gabler of video game cartoon comedies, I'd still be hard-pressed to imagine myself actually liking the movie. But we'll see.

The movie that I am looking forward to, though apparently nobody else is, is Flight: Denzel Washington's long-awaited return to character drama, Robert Zemeckis's long-awaited return to live-action filmmaking, and the two men's first collaboration ever, which feels a couple of decades overdue. Anyway, I've been hoping and wishing for a more intimate, less gruelingly mo-capped Zemeckis movie for many years, and for that alone this would be near the top of my list.

Other wide release: The Man with the Iron Fists, or Things That RZA Likes: The Movie. Score one for personal vision, I guess, and I'm ecstatic to get drunk and watch it on Netflix sometime next year, but does this seems like a deliberately alienating movie to anybody else?


9.11.2012

We don't need to waste time talking about Skyfall, right? Just assert that it is going to be all the kinds of amazing that there are, that the theme song burns across the heavens like a beacon, that Daniel Craig was a great Bond even in the dire Quantum of Solace, and that Javier Bardem's delivery of the line "Mommy was very bad" in the trailer is the stuff that dreams are made of? Because we can talk about it now, or we can talk about it in two weeks, and I can be patient at this point for the film I've been most excited about in the last quarter (last third, really) of the year.

Coastal release: Lincoln, so that you New Yorkers and Los Angelinos can be suitably impressed and overawed by the gravity and seriousness with which Steven Spielberg informs us that Abraham Lincoln was a Great Man.


16.11.2012

Oh man, it's going to be sad when The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 opens, and there will be no more Twilights, because they make such easy targets.

Over in limited release land, there's Anna Karenina, which doesn't "need" to exist, but neither did Joe Wright's Pride & Prejudice, and clearly that turned out well; frankly, this one, with its Tom Stoppard script and meta-theatrical mise en scène, looks even better.

Wide expansion: Lincoln, so that the rest of us can be suitably impressed and overawed by the gravity and seriousness with which Steven Spielberg informs us that Abraham Lincoln was a Great Man.


21.11.2012

The Thanksgiving releases! Those wonderful movies designed to be seen the following Friday by families still overloaded on carbs from the day prior, while also ushering in the exciting days of fifteen Oscar hopefuls all getting released every weekend, so it's not even worth bothering to keep up with them all. In descending order of family friendliness:

-Rise of the Guardians, in which Russian Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny and other characters team up to fight Pure Evil, because sometimes projects get green-lit by major studio executives when they are stoned and later it's too embarrassing to go back and admit it;
-Life of Pi, a shiny, pretty story of life-affirming spirituality based on a book that I hated so much after the first 100 pages that I literally could not summon up the stamina to keep reading it;
-Silver Linings Playbook, in which the great director of dubious actors David O. Russell sets his sights on my great bête noire, Bradley Cooper
-Red Dawn, because even being caught in the flames of MGM's death throes wasn't enough to convince anybody not to.


23.11.2012

The traditional day of shoveling in limited release films that you need to have an awards-qualifying run, but don't actually care if the audience finds you: chief victim being Hitchcock, which finds Anthony Hopkins playing the once-in-a-lifetime role of Anthony Hopkins in a fat suit. The other loser is Rust and Bone, but that was subtitled and was therefore never going to do well in America, regardless.


30.11.2012

And thus we close the month with sad little orphan Killing Them Softly, which used to have an indescribably better title before the marketing men decided that Cogan's Trade was, I don't know, vague. The trailer looks a little sleepy, but I remain passionately in love with previous Brad Pitt/Andrew Dominik collaboration The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, and thus consider myself at least potentially interested.

22 comments:

MrRoivas said...

I've never read "Life of Pi", and your comments about it make me deeply curious as to why it inspires such loathing in you.

Vilsal said...

I saw Skyfall yesterday. No spoilers, but ROT13'd just in case you don't want to hear anything about it:

Vg'f n jryy-znqr zbivr jvgu terng cresbeznaprf naq tbq-yvxr pvarzngbtencul, ohg V qvqa'g yvxr gur nggrzcg gb znxr Obaq n zber cflpubybtvpnyyl pbzcyrk punenpgre. V jvfu gurl xrcg gung gb gur Wbua yr Pneer nqncgngvbaf naq yrg Obaq or uvf tybevbhfyl bar-qvzrafvbany frys, jvgu gur npgbef cebivqvat fbzr fhogrkg nf gurl frr svg. Vg jnfa'g rira irel tbbq cflpubybtl.

Unknown said...

Skyfall was utterly amazing. Everything I could possibly want in a Bond movie.

Might be interesting to see what you do with some of the categories when you come to review it, Tim.

It'll also be interesting to see how you reappraise Casino Royale under the terms of the Bond Marathon. I surely can't imagine it ranking highly in some of your categories, but you've made your satisfaction with the picture known many times.

Kevin J. Olson said...

I once read something that perfectly summed up my feelings about Life of Pi -- I just wish I could remember who said it so that I could give them proper credit...anyway, this person essentially said that Life of Pie was essentially just a novel filled with about 20 empty metaphors per page; no transitions, no style, just metaphor metaphor metaphor.

My own thoughts: he wanted so badly to be Salman Rushdie but didn't stop to think about all of the factors that make Rushdie one of the greatest writers of all time. The fact that Life of Pi won the Booker only elevated its status (although I've long given up, like with the Oscars, on trying to make sense of the Booker Prize).

Thrash Til' Death said...

I hope I'm not alone among kung-fu fans in thinking that "The Man With The Iron Fists" looks ready to plumb new depths of fucking skin-peeling atrocity.

Oliver said...

People think The Man With the Iron Fists looks bad? I already took that night off from work, have four people going with me and I bought a flask disguised as a movie theater-style box of Mike n Ike's. So ready.

Couldn't be more excited for Skyfall. Everything about it looks perfect, and I'm excited that theyll finally deliver on the promise of Casino Royale. Loving the Bond retrospective, by the way, Tim. I've been following along but haven't been commenting along like I should.

Tim said...

MrRoivas- It will, I am certain, take up a large chunk of the review, but the bland prose, stupidly overworked metaphors, and above all, the emerging theme of "all faiths and beliefs are equally valid, except for those dumb dummies the atheists", did not strike me as a work of literature that had anything of value for me as a reader.

Vilsal- I read it, and I will say only that I appreciate that you've pointed out something that the film does that I would have probably preferred it did not so. Good to have expectations managed.

Unknown- I'm really concerned about how to handle my review format without spoiling everything. And CR will be coming soon enough, but for all that it redirects the Bond franchise, I don't think it does so at the cost of the series' tropes. Now, QoS...

Kevin- That squares up exactly with what I though of what I read.

Thrash Til' Death/Oliver- Not enough of a kung fu fan to have a real opinion, but it looks so hugely trashy, probably in an intentional way, but it's hard to call... I know only that I won't be paying $10 to see it, unless it actually manages to go to #1, which would be, to put it lightly, a surprise.

David Greenwood said...

I saw a trailer for "Life of Pi" alongside "Lincoln" before Cloud Atlas, and both gave me an overdose of oozey-sentimental strings which irritate me with a burning sizzle.

I know nothing about "Life of Pi" the novel, nor does it interest me. I will be in the seats opening day simply as an Ang Lee devotee. If nothing else... it will be pretty and well acted?

Jeremy said...

I've heard nothing but good things about the Life of Pi film, and like David I'm an Ang Lee devotee myself. One of the few American directors who seems to keep getting better as he goes along. I would love nothing more than for that movie to be amazing and for Ang Lee to get his Best Picture Oscar he deserved back in 2005.

Skyfall...I don't have to sell you on Skyfall. It looks incredible, everybody who's seen it loves it; 6 years after the awesomeness of Casino Royale, we finally get a worthy follow-up, and I canNOT wait.

Silver Lining Playbook has been on my list for awhile, mostly from the good buzz and a favorite critic of mine said DeNiro actually gives a damn in this one, his best performance since Jackie Brown/Ronin(whichever one you like more). As a HUGE DeNiro fan, I will stomach whatever sappy Bradley Cooper-infested film to see it. Who knows, maybe it's as good as people say? And is this what David O. Russell is doing now? Is he over the quirky Three Kings/I <3 Huckabees and doing solid, conventional dramas? ...I'm ok with this, I guess?

Video games are actually my first love, even beyond cinema, so I pretty much have to love Wreck-It Ralph. Just seeing the trailer had my inner fanboy going, "omg that's Zangief! And look, there's a Donkey Kong arcade reference!" Probably be better than Brave, at any rate. THAT was quite the pedestrian Pixar movie, huh?

Unknown said...

Now I'm REALLY interested as to what you're going to say about Quantum. IIRC, you were reasonably measured when it first released. If you're anything like me, your opinion has darkened over time, and Skyfall made it look even worse in hindsight.

RickR said...

I would officially love it if Tim did his Skyfall review in the marathon format.

Maybe 2 reviews, Tim? One can be your usual opinion piece, and the marathon tropes breakdown could be slathered with spoiler warnings?

Tim said...

I don't know that 5/10 is all that measured, but given that I can't recall a single thing I liked about QoS, it's probably fair to say that I've darkened towards it. I will be rewatching it for the first time since 2008 in just a few days, so we'll find out.

Unknown said...

In Quantum, I enjoyed Craig's performance, the scene at the opera was great and it had a rather good villain. I'm struggling other than that.

Jeremy said...

Oh, I forgot about Flight! Yes, I'll join you in the "please be good, Flight" camp. I'm a big fan of Robert Zemeckis live-action filmmaking(I think I'm the only one who remembers Castaway as a pretty damn good movie instead of just "that one where Tom Hanks was screaming for Wilson"), and I DETEST this weird, CGI-infested world he's fallen into the past decade. He's always been about using the latest technology, but I feel it's hampered all his storytelling gifts. SO happy to see him coming back to the real world, and with Denzel Washington at that! No matter how formulaic the "alcoholic gets his life together" plot may be, Denzel will surely make it work.

DerFuhrer said...

Here's a game for everyone to play. Post up the very first words that come to mind when you read this:

http://www.slashfilm.com/disney-buys-lucasfilm-new-star-wars-film-2015/

Here's mine: What the fuck.

Tim said...

Jeremy- That's sort of exactly how I feel. Denzel has to be interesting, right?

Der Fuhrer- At the risk of being a copycat, that was pretty much my first thought too. Though my later thought, shared with a friend, was "Holy Mary of what the fuck", which I feel is at least more evocative.

David Greenwood said...

@Der Fuhrer - How about "how many more crappy star wars movies will they have to make for the Internet to stop caring about how much the franchise sucks now?"

Slash Prower said...

Speaking of "coming attractions" I can not wait for your review of Silent Hill: Revelation. I have not seen a movie so ridiculously broken and incompetent since The Room, and I can best compare it to The Last Airbender- disappointing and hilarious to people who have played the game, completely incomprehensible to people who haven't.

(If you haven't played Silent Hill 3, by the way, I will be more than happy to write an essay on why it is the worst possible adaptation that could have possibly been made)

jjjonatron said...

That's sad to hear, man. I personally liked the first Silent Hill and figured they at least couldn't have dropped the ball on the creepy atmosphere. I'm trying to see it tonight, but now I'm having second thoughts...

Slash Prower said...

@jjjonatron- Unless you consider evil clowns, shrieking Cenobite things and CARNIVALS ON FIRE the height of creepy tension, this movie did not drop the ball- rather, it stuck the ball in a cannon and fired it into the core of the earth.

It is a fun watch, though, in a fever-dream what-the-fuck-am-i-watching sort of way (if you've played the games. If you haven't, I assume it's just wretched and boring). My boyfriend and I had fun predicting exactly how each jump scare was going to go, considering each one is set up with about 5 minutes of nothing.

Tim said...

Y'all are making it hard for me to want to see Silent Hill: Comin' At Ya, I have to be honest. Which is still on the docket for next week.

Slash Prower said...

@Tim- It's only 94 minutes, at least. If it had been any longer I couldn't have justified paying money to see it.

At least the awful CGI spider-mannequin thing and the awful, awful acting is good for a laugh. It ranges from wooden (Carrie Anne-Moss could not summon up even the slightest amount of emotion to improve her miserable line reading) to confused/bored (Kit Harington did not make the slightest attempt to hide his accent, and his lines all come out slightly slurred) to wildly overdone (Malcolm McDowell is in this movie for maybe 2 minutes, and it is without a doubt the highlight).

Of course, on the bad side every piece of dialogue is exposition that contradicts the exposition previously given, half of it is boring as all hell, and I'm pretty sure the actual antagonist doesn't appear until 60 minutes into the 90-minute movie, and then shows up for perhaps one scene just to disappear again until the climax.

Have fun!